Nathan Renner Jung vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D16-2170 _____________________________ NATHAN RENNER JUNG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge. May 17, 2018 PER CURIAM. We reverse the court’s summary denial of Appellant’s second claim for postconviction relief, which we conclude was facially sufficient. We remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on that claim or to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting it. See Odom v. State, 782 So. 2d 510, 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); see also Smalls v. State, 973 So. 2d 630, 63132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“If appellant’s allegation is correct, no factual basis existed to support a conviction for burglary of a dwelling. Appellant further claims that he would not have entered his guilty plea but for his counsel’s ineffectiveness. As such, appellant’s allegations constitute a facially sufficient claim for ineffective assistance of counsel.”). We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s remaining claims. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. RAY, MAKAR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Nathan Renner Jung, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.