Ivan Ramond Richardson vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IVAN RAMOND RICHARDSON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D16-4778 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed November 8, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge. Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Ivan Richardson appeals the trial court’s finding that he violated probation and the resulting prison sentence. Richardson represented himself for both the VOP hearing and the sentencing hearing held immediately after. While the court conducted a sufficient Faretta ∗ inquiry before the violation hearing, it failed to renew the offer of counsel before sentencing. Therefore, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Cuyler v. State, 131 So. 3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“While a full Faretta inquiry need not be conducted at every stage of criminal proceedings, once counsel has been waived under Faretta, the offer of assistance of counsel must be renewed by the court at each critical stage of the proceedings. . . . Sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding.”). REVERSED and REMANDED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR. ∗ Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.