LANDON L. WILLIAMS, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; WILLIAM KING, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; LAW OFFICES OF R. CRAIG HEMPHILL & ASSOCIATES, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND PAUL K. DICK, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA LANDON L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D13-2961 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; WILLIAM KING, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; LAW OFFICES OF R. CRAIG HEMPHILL & ASSOCIATES; R. CRAIG HEMPHILL, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND PAUL K. DICK, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 1, 2013. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Thomas Beverly, Judge. Landon L. Williams, pro se, Appellant. Daniel R. Duello, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of appellant s response to the Court s order of June 25, 2013, the Court has determined that the Order on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is not a final order because it fails to conclude the judicial labor in the case. We decline appellant s suggestion that we undertake certiorari review, concluding that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal will result in injury which cannot be adequately remedied on appeal following final judgment. Belair v. Drew, 770 So. 2d 1164, 1166 (Fla. 2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
