STATE OF FLORIDA, v. WALTER DOUGLAS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D13-1364 WALTER DOUGLAS, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 22, 2013. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Scott Duncan, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Bryan Jordan and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The State appeals the trial court s imposition of a downward departure sentence after Appellee entered an admission to violating his probation. While Appellee s scoresheet resulted in a minimum recommended sentence of 48.45 months imprisonment, the trial court sentenced Appellee to one year in county jail. The State argues, and we agree, that the trial court s reason for departure was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. When imposing a downward departure sentence, the trial court must determine whether there is a factually supported, legal ground for departure and whether departure is the best sentencing option for the defendant. State v. Adkison, 56 So. 3d 880, 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). This Court reviews departure sentences to determine whether the grounds for departure were supported by competent, substantial evidence. Id. Here, the trial court stated that it was imposing a downward departure sentence pursuant to section 921.0026(2)(j), Florida Statutes, because the crimes were committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which Appellee had shown remorse. However, there was no competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court s finding that Appellee s charges were an isolated incident. Appellee was on probation for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon, possession of burglary tools, two counts of grand theft, and criminal mischief. Appellee violated his probation by committing two new misdemeanor offenses. Moreover, Appellee s prior record consisted of twenty-two felony convictions and over two dozen misdemeanor convictions. Due to Appellee s 2 extensive criminal history, the trial court was precluded from finding his violation of probation was an isolated incident. State v. Thompkins, 113 So. 3d 95, 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); State v. Leverett, 44 So. 3d 634, 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); State v. Gaines, 971 So. 2d 219, 221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); State v. Ayers, 901 So. 2d 942, 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). We, therefore, REVERSE the sentence on appeal and REMAND for resentencing. THOMAS, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
