MARTHA CESERY TAYLOR, v. THE BEACH HOUSE RESIDENCES OF THE BEACH HOUSE RESIDENCES OF SOUTH BEACH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, F/K/A, SOUTHERN WATERVIEW DEVELOPMENT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, WALTER Q. TAYLOR, AN INDIVIDUAL, STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, A GEORGIA BANKING CORPORATION, HATHAWAY & REYNOLDS, P.A., F/K/A, RICHARD G. HATHAWAY, P.A., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, MEREDITH M. LORD, AN INDIVIDUAL, BUYER'S BROKER REALTY CONSULTANTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND BEACH HOUSE OF JACKSONVILLE ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, THE JACKSONVILLE BANK, A FLORIDA BANKING CORPORATION

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARTHA CESERY TAYLOR, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-6001 THE BEACH HOUSE RESIDENCES OF THE BEACH HOUSE RESIDENCES OF SOUTH BEACH, INC., a Florida corporation, f/k/a, Southern Waterview Development, Inc., a Florida corporation, WALTER Q. TAYLOR, an individual, STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a Georgia banking corporation, HATHAWAY & REYNOLDS, P.A., f/k/a, Richard G. Hathaway, P.A., a Florida corporation, MEREDITH M. LORD, an individual, BUYER S BROKER REALTY CONSULTANTS, Inc., a Florida corporation, and BEACH HOUSE OF JACKSONVILLE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, THE JACKSONVILLE BANK, a Florida banking corporation, Appellees. ___________________________/ Opinion filed June 27, 2013. An appeal from an order of the Duval County Circuit Court. 1 Waddell Wallace, Judge. Martha Cesery Taylor, pro se, Appellant. Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman Senterfitt, Tallahassee; and Jacob A. Brown of Akerman Senterfitt, Jacksonville, for Appellee The Jacksonville Bank. PER CURIAM. Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the court s jurisdiction to review the lower tribunal s final judgment of foreclosure was invoked in a timely fashion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. MARSTILLER, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.