JERRY WEEKS, v. STATE FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JERRY WEEKS, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3629 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _________________________/ Opinion filed January 10, 2013. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge. Jerry Weeks, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Brooke Poland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court s denial of Appellant s successive motion for postconviction relief. We note that Appellant s most recent motion addresses the same argument and alleged facts previously pled and which this court rejected in Weeks v. State, 49 So. 3d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Furthermore, in our case number 1D11-1052, which addressed another of Appellant s post-conviction motions in this case, this court issued an order warning Appellant that the filing of any further procedurally-barred challenges to his conviction and sentence may result in imposition of sanctions by this court pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes. Appellant s motion below in this case was improperly successive and this appeal is likewise improper. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate correctional institution for the imposition of disciplinary proceedings against Appellant, in accordance with section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2004). We also direct the Clerk of this court not to accept any pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by Appellant relating to Santa Rosa County Case number 1983-I-534 unless such filings are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. AFFIRMED. Certified Opinion FORWARDED to the Department of Corrections. WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.