JOSEPH W. ATKINS, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOSEPH W. ATKINS, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3031 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed September 23, 2013. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. William L. Gary, Judge. Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks a new trial, claiming the trial court committed reversible error when it denied his request for self-representation upon finding appellant was not competent to represent himself. We agree. The record shows appellant presumptively made an unequivocal request for self-representation by repeatedly seeking to discharge defense counsel, whom he found unacceptable, after being informed that he was not entitled to substitute counsel. See Pasha v. State, 39 So. 3d 1259, 1262 (Fla. 2010). After conducting the necessary inquiry pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), the trial court could not deny appellant s request by finding appellant was not competent to represent himself. State v. Bowen, 698 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1997). Rather, the court had to determine whether appellant was competent to waive the right to counsel. Weaver v. State, 894 So. 2d 178, 193 (Fla. 2004). Based on the court s Faretta inquiry, there was no basis to conclude appellant was not competent to waive his right to counsel. See Laidler v. State, 69 So. 3d 1008, 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial. Id. 1009-10. In light of this disposition, we do not reach appellant s remaining claim on appeal. REVERSED and REMANDED. CLARK, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.