FIRST REAL ESTATE, LLC, v. KAREN T. GRANT, individually and as KAREN T. GRANT, Trustee, CHIP HARBOUR, III, individually and as managing member of CBH PROPERTIES, LLC, STEPHEN D. BACHMAN, WILLIAM MATHIEU, WORLD OF REALTY OF BAY COUNTY, INC., BEACH BOYS REALTY, INC., OCEAN REEF DEVELOPERS, LLC, and OCEAN REEF DEVELOPERS, II, LLC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-0614 KAREN T. GRANT, individually and as KAREN T. GRANT, Trustee, CHIP HARBOUR, III, individually and as managing member of CBH PROPERTIES, LLC, STEPHEN D. BACHMAN, WILLIAM MATHIEU, WORLD OF REALTY OF BAY COUNTY, INC., BEACH BOYS REALTY, INC., OCEAN REEF DEVELOPERS, LLC, and OCEAN REEF DEVELOPERS, II, LLC, Appellees. ___________________________/ Opinion filed June 6, 2012. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County. Hentz McClellan, Judge. Alvin L. Peters of Peters & Scoon, Panama City, for Appellant. Michael P. Dickey and Jeffrey S. Carter of Barron, Redding, Hughes, Fite, Sanborn, Kiehn, Leebrick & Dickey, P.A., Panama City, for Appellee. ON MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY S FEES PER CURIAM. Appellant filed a breach of contract action against Appellee Bachman and others. Judgment was entered in favor of Bachman and Appellant appealed. Shortly after the clerk of the lower tribunal filed the record index, and prior to the parties filing any briefs, Appellant voluntarily dismissed the appeal under rule 9.350(b). Bachman seeks an award of attorney s fees as the prevailing party in this appeal. The contract at issue in this case includes a prevailing party attorney s fee provision, which by virtue of section 59.46, Florida Statutes, includes appellate attorney s fees. Appellant appears to concede that Bachman is the prevailing party in this appeal, but it objects to an award of appellate attorney s fees on the basis that appellee s involvement in this appeal has been de minimus. There is support for Appellant s position in Sanchez v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company, 997 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). However, we agree with Judge Shepherd s dissent in that case that there is no de minimus exception when determining entitlement to a fee award. Id. at 1210. Although the dismissal of this appeal at an early stage will certainly impact the amount of fees awarded, it has no bearing on Bachman s entitlement to fees. Accordingly, we grant Bachman s motion for appellate attorney s fees, and we remand this case to the trial court to determine the amount of the award if the parties are unable to agree on an amount. 2 MOTION GRANTED; CASE REMANDED. ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
