C.L., Father of H.D. and T.A.D., v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA C.L., Father of H.D. and T.A.D., Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-1941 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. ____________________________/ Opinion filed August 4, 2011. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. E. Vernon Douglas, Judge. Lucas Jordan Taylor, Live Oak, for Appellant. Tracy Sorcek, Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee; Monica Taibl, Guardian Ad Litem, Lake City; Ward L. Metzger, Children s Legal Services, Jacksonville; Kelley Schaeffer, Guardian Ad Litem Program, Tavares, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We conclude that the trial court erred in holding the final hearing on termination of parental rights at a time when the appellant could not be present. Although the appellant was aware that his failure to appear at the hearing would be deemed a consent to termination, he had informed the court prior to the hearing that he could not attend on the scheduled date because he was working in Louisiana and could neither miss work nor afford to make the trip until he was paid. See In re H.S., 995 So.2d 516, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (deeming financial hardship of a parent a circumstance beyond the parent s control); In re A.N.D., 883 So. 2d 910, 914 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (explaining that courts should avoid terminating a parent s rights if the parent is making a reasonable effort to be present at the hearing but is prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control). He had requested only a short delay until he could be paid and travel to Florida, and the Department neither disputed or disproved the facts on which the appellant relied. Therefore, we reverse the final order terminating the appellant s parental rights and remand for a new final hearing. Reversed and remanded. PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
