JAMES INGRAM, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JAMES INGRAM, Petitioner, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-0554 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ___________________________/ Opinion filed April 21, 2011. Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction. James Ingram, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for leave to supplement. Petitioner alleges that he filed the motion in the circuit court in 2003; however, the circuit court has no record of ever receiving the motion. Accordingly, because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Casen v. McDonough, 962 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Petitioner alleges that he did timely place his pleading into the hands of prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this cause, petitioner shall file with the clerk of the circuit court a copy of the pleading. See Rife v. State, 958 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hartley v. Fla. Dep t of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). PETITION DENIED. WEBSTER, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.