CRAIG SIMS v. WAYNE MEREDITH and WANDA MEREDITH and M. PETE McNABB, etc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CRAIG SIMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. CASE NO. 1D06-5771 WAYNE MEREDITH AND WANDA MEREDITH AND M. PETE MCNABB OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, INC., GARNISHEE, Appellees. _______________________________/ Opinion filed October 19, 2007. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Nickolas P. Geeker, Judge. Robert O. Beasley and Chris K. Ritchie of Litvak Beasley & Wilson, LLP, Pensascola, for Appellant. James M. Messer of the Messer Law Firm, P.A., Pensacola, and William R. Mitchell, Pensacola, for Appellees. BARFIELD, J. Appellant, Craig Sims, sought to enforce a judgment against Wayne and Wanda Meredith by serving two writs of garnishment on M. Pete McNabb, who Sims believed owed money to the Merediths. The writs were served by certified process servers. McNabb moved to quash service of process on the grounds that such process must be served by a sheriff's deputy. The trial judge agreed and quashed service of both writs. We reverse. Section 48.021, Florida Statutes (2003) and (2005), provides all process will be served by a sheriff except for initial non-enforceable civil process. A writ of garnishment brings before the court, for the first time, a garnishee believed to hold money or other property of the judgment debtor. Before any enforcement can be had under chapter 77, Florida Statutes (2005), the debtor is entitled to notice and may assert exemptions, the garnishee is afforded an opportunity to answer, and the judgment creditor must obtain a judgment against the garnishee. Service of a writ of garnishment is an initial non-enforceable civil process. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. HAWKES, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
