W. T. PARKER v. JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA W.T. PARKER, Petitioner, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. CASE NO. 1D06-4858 JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent. ______________________________/ Opinion filed June 21, 2007. Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction. W.T. Parker, pro se, Petitioner. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Linda Horton Dodson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. We also deny petitioner s request to quash the circuit court s order on indigency for filing the petition for writ of mandamus below. There is nothing in the record to show that petitioner requested relief from that order by filing a proper motion in the circuit court, therefore, petitioner waived the issue. Norman v. Fla. Parole Comm n, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D1316 (Fla. 1st DCA May 21, 2007); Kemp v. McDonough, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D1126 (Fla. 1st DCA Apr. 30, 2007). However, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430, we quash the circuit court s order imposing a lien for costs and fees incurred in this appellate proceeding and direct the circuit court to order reimbursement of any funds that have been withdrawn from petitioner s inmate trust account to satisfy the improper appellate fee lien order. Wheeler v. McDonough, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D1262 (Fla. 1st DCA May 14, 2007); Reddick v. McDonough, 938 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Because petitioner challenged the loss of gain time, the proceeding below qualified as a collateral criminal proceeding under Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2003), and there is no authority for imposing a lien under section 57.081, Florida Statutes (2006), the general indigency statute. Cason v. Crosby, 892 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). KAHN, LEWIS, and HAWKES, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.