MARCELINO GUDINO v. OASIS OUTSOURCING and CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARCELINO GUDINO, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D04-5204 OASIS OUTSOURCING and CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed June 20, 2006. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Charles M. Hill III, Judge. Christopher Graver of Law Offices of William F. Souza, North Miami Beach, for Appellant. Desi J. Morales of Charouhis, Fandino, Lopez & Write, Miami, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Marcelino Gudino appeals an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) enforcing a Mediation Settlement Agreement signed by the parties at the conclusion of a mediation conference. The record supports the JCC s determination that the parties intended the Mediation Settlement Agreement to be a full/washout settlement of the workers' compensation case, with payment of a monetary sum in exchange for relinquishment of any and all claims for indemnity and medical care, past, present and future. We are bound by this determination. See Calderon v. J.B. Nurseries, Inc., 31 Fla. L. Weekly D392 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 6, 2006). We note, however, that this is the extent of the settlement in this case and, as counsel for the employer/carrier recognized during oral argument, the JCC has only enforced the terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement. AFFIRMED. KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
