CARL CARLIN v. SUSAN CARLIN

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CARL CARLIN, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D04-850 SUSAN CARLIN, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed March 10, 2005. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John P. Kuder, Judge. E. Jane Brehany, Pensacola, for Appellant. Patrick L. Jackson of Chase, Quinnell, McIver & Jackson, Pensacola, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The denial of the appellant s petition to terminate permanent alimony is affirmed because the appellant did not preserve the issue of whether the trial court erred by considering parol evidence. The portion of the appeal challenging the nonfinal, non-appealable ruling that the appellee is entitled to trial level attorneys fees and costs, without setting an amount, is dismissed. See Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So. 2d 215, 215-16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also JB Investments, Inc. v. John B. Kane and Co., Inc., 805 So. 2d 900, 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.