PETER M. BUKACHESKI, C.O. AND BRAD A., etc v. BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE & FLORID

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
PETER M. BUKACHESKI, C.O. AND BRAD A., etc., Appellants, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE Appellee, & FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOTISTS AND PROSTHETISTS AND MORRIS GALLO, Appellants, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE Appellee, & Appellant, v. COURT OF STATE OF NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. BOARD OF ORTHOTISTS PROSTHETISTS, IN THE DISTRICT APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, FLORIDA AND CASE NO. 1D02-3457 & 1D02-3464 & 1D02-3473 BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE AND NICK GALVEZ, Appellees. _____________________________/ Opinion filed August 6, 2003. An appeal from an order of the Department of Health. Mark K. Logan, Esq. of Ballard & Logan, P.A., Tallahassee, for Peter M. Bukacheski, C.O. and Brad A. Gallo, C.P.O; Martin R. Dix, Esq. of Katz, Kutter, Alderman, Bryant & Yon, P.A., Tallahassee, for The Florida Association of Orthotists and Prosthetists and Morris Gallo; Charlie Christ, Attorney General, M. Catherine Lannon, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Board of Orthotists and Prosthetists. Donna Erlich, Assistant General Counsel for Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Board of Physical Therapy Practice; Thomas A. Sheehan, III, Esq. and Marshall J. Osofsky, Esq. of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Raymond & Sheehan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for The Florida Physical Therapy Association, Amicus Curiae. PER CURIAM. Upon further consideration, this Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction to consider these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 120.68(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). DISMISSED. 2 LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR; WOLF, C.J., CONCURS WITH WRITTEN OPINION. 3 WOLF, C.J., CONCURRING. The dismissal of this action shall not be construed as approval of the actions of the appellees, nor should this dismissal be construed to preclude any other administrative or civil action which may be available to appellants. 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.