WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR vs CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, P.A., RUSSELL E. KLEMM, NEAL MCCULLOH, KENNETH M. CLAYTON, ALAN SCHWARTZSEID, BRIAN HESS, COACH HOUSES AT LEESBURG CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., GARY HANSEN, ET AL.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D21-1593 CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, P.A., RUSSELL E. KLEMM, NEAL MCCULLOH, KENNETH M. CLAYTON, ALAN SCHWARTZSEID, BRIAN HESS, COACH HOUSES AT LEESBURG CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., GARY HANSEN, ET AL. Respondents. ________________________/ Opinion filed August 30, 2021 Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Dan R. Mosley, Respondent Judge. William Michael Windsor, Leesburg, pro se. No Appearance for Respondents. PER CURIAM. Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking various orders in Lake County Circuit Court Case Number 2021-CA-0766, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the Response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED. WALLIS, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.