CHRISTOPHER KENNETH MILLER vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHRISTOPHER KENNETH MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. 5D21-827 LT Case Nos. 2020-CT-001439 2020-CT-001438 2020-TR-021199 Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 2, 2021 Appeal from the County Court for Osceola County, Christine E. Arendas, Judge. Christopher Kenneth Miller, Kissimmee, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See State v. Partlow, 840 So. 2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 2003) (holding that “once sentence has been imposed, to withdraw a plea a defendant must demonstrate a manifest injustice requiring correction” (citing Lopez v. State, 536 So. 2d 226, 229 (Fla. 1988))); Bonamy v. State, 313 So. 3d 1214, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (affirming denial of the defendant’s motion to withdraw plea where “[t]he coercion alleged after sentencing is refuted by the transcript and the written plea agreement” (quoting Rivera v. State, 984 So. 2d 574, 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (additional citations omitted))); Thompson v. State, 50 So. 3d 1208, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy.” (citing Iacono v. State, 930 So. 2d 829, 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006))). LAMBERT, C.J., TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.