BRADLEY T. PACE vs SHARESE M. PACE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BRADLEY T. PACE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D20-723 SHARESE M. PACE, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 8, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Diana M. Tennis, Judge. Gary S. Israel, of Gary S. Israel, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We reverse the order finding Bradley T. Pace in contempt for the reasons we explained in Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (Pace I). The evidence presented at the hearing in this case is essentially identical to the evidence in Pace I.1 REVERSED and REMANDED. EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 1 We observe that the trial court did not have the benefit of Pace I when rendering the instant order of contempt.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.