JASON GUY ROLFE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JASON GUY ROLFE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D19-1151 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 27, 2020 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Howard M. Maltz, Judge. Benjamin Davis and Oscar Hardin Eaton, Jr., of the Office of Regional Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Jason Guy Rolfe’s judgment and sentence in all but one respect. We reverse and remand the imposition of the $100 cost for the FDLE 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Operating Trust Fund. See § 938.055, Fla. Stat. (2019). The trial court did not orally pronounce this cost at sentencing. See Montanez v. State, 275 So. 3d 1265, 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (citing Cain v. State, 197 So. 3d 1096, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)). If applicable and procedurally justified, the trial court may reimpose it on remand. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. COHEN, EDWARDS and TRAVER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.