NOEL B. CAMPANHAC vs RILEY LAURAMORE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED NOEL B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1001 RILEY LAURAMORE, Appellee. and NOEL B. CAMPANHAC, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1002 BEVERLY LAURAMORE, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 8, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Joe Boatwright, Acting Circuit Judge. Eric J. Friday, of Kingry Jacksonville, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees. HARRIS, J. & Friday, Appellant, Noel Campanhac, appeals the trial court’s final judgments of injunction for protection against stalking in these related cases, 1 arguing that there was insufficient evidence of stalking to support the injunctions. After considering the limited testimony and evidence presented below and without the benefit of briefs or any appearance by Appellees, we agree with Appellant that there was no competent, substantial evidence to support a finding of stalking. See Packal v. Johnson, 226 So. 3d 337, 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (holding that each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support injunction against stalking). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction. REVERSED. LAMBERT and SASSO, JJ., concur. 1 This Court has consolidated these cases for purposes of this opinion only. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.