Travis R. Stucky v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TRAVIS RAY STUCKY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-580 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 24, 2018 3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge. Travis Ray Stucky, Bushnell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The trial court denied Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Luckner v. State, 979 So. 2d 1121, 1121–22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
