Zachary Linville v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ZACHARY LINVILLE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D18-1975 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 24, 2018 Petition for Belated Appeal, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Zachary Linville, Wewahitchka, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent. EDWARDS, J. The petition for belated appeal is denied. The record before this Court shows that Petitioner, Zachary Linville, failed to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b). That rule requires the notice of appeal to be filed with the clerk of the court whose order or judgment is being appealed within thirty days of rendition. If a pro se inmate relies upon the institution in which the inmate is incarcerated to mail the inmate’s notice of appeal, the inmate must clearly state in writing that the original notice of appeal is to be mailed to and filed with the clerk of the court whose order or judgment is being appealed, and should include the name and address of that clerk of the court on the certificate of service. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(a)(2) governs the procedure for a notice of appeal that is addressed to the clerk of the lower court and placed in the hands of the inmate’s institution for mailing. However, filing of the notice of appeal does not occur when an inmate, as Petitioner did here, places in the hands of the institution a notice of appeal with a certificate of service that lists the State Attorney and/or the Attorney General, but which does not affirmatively direct mailing of the original notice of appeal to the clerk of the lower court.1 In this case, the time for filing the original notice of appeal with the clerk of the lower court has expired; therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain Petitioner’s appeal, and there is no legal basis for granting Petitioner’s request for a belated appeal. PETITION DENIED. SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur. 1 The Appellate Rules Committee should consider whether it would be desirable to amend rule 9.420(d)(1) and/or Form 9.900(a) by including language in a model pro se inmate certificate of service for notices of appeal, to the effect that “the original notice of appeal is to be mailed to and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit/County Court for ____ County” to clarify the requirement that the inmate affirmatively direct that the original notice of appeal is to be mailed to the clerk of the lower tribunal for filing. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
