Orlando Alvarez v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ORLANDO ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1135 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed July 20, 2018 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge. Orlando Alvarez, Daytona Beach, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Orlando Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his amended Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand the summary denial of Alvarez’s first ground for relief, alleging that his trial counsel failed to depose the victim and other relevant witnesses. The ground, as pled, was facially insufficient but Alvarez was not put on notice of the defect. The postconviction court should have granted Alvarez leave to amend. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); Osorio v. State, 233 So. 3d 516, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Should Alvarez amend this claim, if the postconviction court wants to summarily deny relief again, it must attach records that conclusively refute this ground for relief. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5); Castro v. State, 240 So. 3d 877, 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (indicating that statement of satisfaction with counsel alone is generally insufficient to conclusively refute claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call witness). In all other respects, we affirm the trial court's order. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
