Jeromy S. Schiedenhelm v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JEROMY STEPHEN SCHIEDENHELM, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-3504 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 31, 2018 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Jeromy Stephen Schiedenhelm, Live Oak, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant, Jeromy Schiedenhelm, appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, where he raised eight claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because Appellant filed a legally and facially sufficient claim in ground six, and the attachments do not conclusively refute the claim, we reverse the summary denial of ground six and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. See Cioeta v. State, 204 So. 3d 156 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). In all other respects, we affirm. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. SAWAYA, TORPY, and WALLIS JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.