Northport Health v. Estate of Gertrude R. Champagne
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC and NHS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellants, v. Case No. 5D17-2693 ESTATE OF GERTRUDE R. CHAMPAGNE BY AND THROUGH GLORIA OLSEN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, Appellee. _____________________________________/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles J. Roberts, Judge. Dale R. Sisco and Kristi Neher Davisson, of Sisco-Law, Tampa, for Appellants. Megan L Gisclar and Joanna Greber Dettloff, of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. WALLIS, J. Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC d/b/a West Melbourne Health and Rehabilitation Center, appeals the trial court's order denying Northport's motion to compel arbitration with Gloria Olsen, as personal representative of the Estate of Gertrude R. Champagne. We have recently addressed the enforceability of an identical arbitration agreement in Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC v. Louis, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D505 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 2, 2018). We held in Louis that the provision requiring Alabama's Rules of Evidence to control the admissibility of evidence at arbitration was against public policy, and that the provision was severable because it concerns procedure. Id. at D506. However, we also held that the provision requiring the application of Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure to the parties' conduct of pre-hearing discovery does not violate public policy because no convincing argument was raised as to why the application is problematic. Id. Here, the parties raise essentially the same arguments. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to grant Northport's motion to compel and to sever from the arbitration agreement the provision applying the Alabama Rules of Evidence to the admissibility of evidence at the arbitration hearing. Id.; see also Hancock v. Northport Health Servs. of Fla., LLC, 150 So. 3d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (affirming an order compelling arbitration of an identical arbitration agreement). REVERSED and REMANDED, with Instructions. SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
