Linden v. Reemployment

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED GINA M. LINDEN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-1051 REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 5, 2018 Administrative Appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Gina M. Linden, Windermere, pro se. Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Appellate Attorney, of Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Gina M. Linden appeals from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission (“RAAC”) dismissing her appeal of an administrative decision denying unemployment compensation benefits as untimely. We affirm. Ms. Linden contends that she had good cause for failing to timely file her appeal with the RAAC. Unfortunately, section 443.151(4)(b)1., Florida Statutes (2016), which governs appeals from RAAC determinations, does not provide a “good cause” exception that would permit the RAAC to accept an untimely appeal. See Thurmond v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 881 So. 2d 89, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The courts have carved out a limited exception in cases where the claimant alleges the untimeliness of unemployment appeals was “occasioned by the actions of the Commission.” Assam v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 871 So. 2d 978, 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). However, that has not been demonstrated here. Therefore, although sympathetic to her plight, we must affirm the RAAC decision. AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.