Nathan L. Garrow v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED NATHAN LEE GARROW, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-242 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 8, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Raul A. Zambrano, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Nathan Garrow (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentences entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of operating a chop shop, conspiracy to commit dealing in stolen property, and four counts of dealing in stolen property. Finding no merit in the claims of error raised on appeal, we affirm. However, a scrivener’s error appears on the last page of the defendant's sentencing documents where the following paragraph appears: In imposing the above sentence, the court further recommends: CT 1 & 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL- CTS 2,7,8,13 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL FOLLOWED BY 5 YEARS OF PROBATION. The paragraph should read: “CTS 1 & 4 3 YEARS. . . .” Accordingly, we remand for correction of the defendant's sentencing documents. AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR. SAWAYA, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.