Tyler Weisman v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TYLER WEISMAN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-27 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed May 12, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Donna L. McIntosh, Judge. William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking Tyler Weisman’s probation except as to the alleged violation of special condition E. As to that special condition, we conclude the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of a willful violation. As a result, on remand, the trial court shall strike the finding of a violation of special condition E from the order of revocation. Because it is clear the trial court would have revoked Mr. Weisman’s probation without considering the alleged violation of special condition E, we affirm. See Lee v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199, 1201-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF CORRECTED ORDER. SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.