J.D. v. DCF
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J.D., FATHER OF A.D., A CHILD, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-4112 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. ________________________________________/ Opinion filed May 5, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Julian E. Collins, Judge. Sara Howeller, Oviedo, for Appellant. Gale Forman Collins, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Guardian ad Litem. Rosemarie Farrell, Children's Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. J.D. ("Appellant"), father of A.D., a child, appeals the trial court's order adjudicating A.D. dependent. Appellant argues, and the Department of Children and Families properly concedes, that no competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that Appellant and A.D.'s mother subjected A.D. to abuse as defined by section 39.01(2), Florida Statutes (2015). We agree and reverse the order adjudicating A.D. dependent.1 REVERSED. SAWAYA, BERGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur. 1 We note that the Guardian ad Litem Program ("GAL") does not concede error, arguing that we must affirm because the order adjudicating A.D. dependent makes findings regarding A.D.'s mother, who did not appeal. We disagree that Appellant lacks standing to challenge the trial court's order in its entirety. Reversal of a dependency adjudication is appropriate where only one parent appeals, despite findings relating to both parents. See, e.g., S.D. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 42 So. 3d 938, 940 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
