Jensen v. Thibodeaux

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2012 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MICHAEL JENSEN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D12-2689 TRACY THIBODEAUX, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 9, 2012 Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lawrence R. Kirkwood, Senior Judge. Carlton Pierce, of Carlton Pierce, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court s denial of the former husband s motion for contempt. However, we direct the trial court to strike paragraphs three through seven of the Order on Respondent s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification because said provisions are over-broad and lack clarity. If the trial court wishes to outline a procedure for future visitations in light of the former husband's prior conduct, the order should be clear and comprehensive so that the parties will be aware of their respective responsibilities and the order may readily be enforced. AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED. GRIFFIN, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.