Joshua Meshell v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2011 JOSHUA MESHELL, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D10-4004 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 28, 2011 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, F. Rand Wallis, Judge. Joshua Meshell, Panama City, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion, which disputes the trial court s imposition of numerous items of costs and alleges conflict between the court s oral pronouncement and its written sentence. The trial court denied the motion without giving any reasons or attaching portions of the record to refute the allegations. The State concedes that the form of the trial court's order is erroneous. With the limited record we have, we are unable to sort through Appellant's various claims. On remand, the trial court shall either grant the relief or attach portions of the record that refute the claims. REVERSED AND REMANDED. ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.