Laurent Dorivert v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2011 LAURENT DORIVERT, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D09-1906 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 29, 2011 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Mark Lubet, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Laurent Dorivert timely appeals a jury verdict convicting him of the first-degree murder of his wife, Marie Dorivert. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in this circumstantial evidence case. We have carefully considered the evidence presented at trial in light of the standard applicable in circumstantial evidence cases. See, e.g., McArthur v. State, 351 So. 2d 972, 976 (Fla. 1977). More specifically, we find that the eye witness testimony placing Dorivert at the scene of the murder in the narrow time frame during which the murder occurred, along with the blood and DNA evidence linking Dorivert to the murder scene were sufficient to rebut Dorivert's proffered hypothesis of innocence -- that he was running errands and nowhere near the crime scene during or after the murder, so that someone else must have committed the crime. AFFIRMED. TORPY, LAWSON, and COHEN, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
