Tina Rakoski v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2010 TINA MARIE RAKOSKI, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-813 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed June 18, 2010 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, J. David Walsh, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Tina Marie Rakoski appeals her sentence and the denial of her motion to correct sentence. We affirm without discussion, except as to condition number 30 of Rakoski s community control order. We strike condition 30 as the statute cited as authority for the assessment of this cost, section 948.02, Florida Statutes, was renumbered in 1977 as section 945.26, Florida Statutes (1977), which in turn was repealed in 1985. See Ch. 85-288 § 27, Laws of Fla. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.