Steven Bertuglia v. Catherine Roe

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2010 STEVEN BERTUGLIA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-3615 CATHERINE BERTUGLIA ROE, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed July 30, 2010 Non Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lisa T. Munyon, Judge. Steven Bertuglia, Fairton, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion for civil contempt. A party may not be held in contempt for violation of an order which is not clear and definite enough to provide notice of what the party is required to do in order to comply with the court's decree. See Marcus v. Marcus, 902 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Kranis v. Kranis, 313 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant seeking to have the trial court set a specific visitation schedule. AFFIRMED. EVANDER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.