Louis Branson v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008 LOUIS WYATT BRANSON, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D07-1630 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 29, 2008 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, David B. Eddy, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. EVANDER, J. After a jury trial in which he represented himself, Branson was convicted of possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and attachment of an unassigned tag to a motor vehicle. He was sentenced to four years imprisonment on the cocaine charge and to time served on the misdemeanor offenses. On appeal, Branson contends that the trial court erred by accepting his waiver of the right to appointed counsel in the absence of any warning that if convicted at trial and sentenced to prison, he might be subject to indefinite civil commitment under the Jimmy Ryce Act 1 upon completion of his prison sentence. We affirm. Branson was convicted of a sexual battery in 1977. As a result, he faces the possibility of civil commitment under the Jimmy Ryce Act upon completion of his sentence, even though his current charges did not involve a sexual offense. Ward v. State, 33 Fla. L. Weekly S45 (Fla. Jan. 17, 2008), as revised on denial of rehearing, 33 Fla. L. Weekly S564 (Fla. July 03, 2008). While Faretta 2 requires a trial court to make a defendant aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, it does not require that a defendant be apprised of each and every potential collateral consequence of an adverse judgment. Potts v. State, 698 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), approved, 718 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 1998). We agree with the State that the other issues raised by Branson were not preserved for appeal. AFFIRMED. MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur. 1 ยงยง 394.910-932, Fla. Stat. 2 Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.