Fred Wilkinson v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2007 FRED WILKINSON, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D07-291 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 20, 2007 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County, Kim C. Hammond , Judge. Fred Wilkinson, Carrabelle, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Fred Wilkinson appeals the denial of his fourth rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence.1 In this successive motion, Wilkinson once again challenges his habitual offender sentences entered in Flagler County case nos. 89-304 and 89-408. The trial court properly denied Wilkinson's motion as successive, and we issued a Spencer2 show cause order. Wilkinson responded by once again attempting to argue the merits of his underlying motion. 1 2 See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800. State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). At this point, Wilkinson is abusing the judicial process with his successive attacks on his sentences. In order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Fred Wilkinson from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Flagler County, Seventh Judicial Circuit Court case nos. 89-304 and 89-408. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning these cases. Any further pleadings regarding these cases will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). AFFIRMED; future pro se filings PROHIBITED. SAWAYA, LAWSON, and EVANDER, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
