Prasad v. Turner
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 RUSUM D. PRASAD and EILEEN R. PRASAD, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5D04-1432 CORRECTED WAYNE M. TURNER, Respondent. ______________________________/ Opinion filed September 17, 2004 Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John Dean Moxley, Jr., Judge. Thomas C. Smith of Eubank, Hassell & Moorhead, Daytona Beach, for Petitioners. Christian A. Lindbaek of Alpizar & Ville, Palm Bay, for Respondent. SHARP, W., J. Rusum and Eileen Prasad seek certiorari review of discovery orders which granted their request for a compulsory medical examination of Wayne Turner (the plaintiff in a personal injury case in which the Prasads are defendants) by a designated orthopaedic surgeon, but which denied their request for an additional compulsory medical examination of the plaintiff by a designated neurologist. We deny the petition because it fails to establish irreparable injury on the part of petitioners. Petitioners also request, in the event this court denies their petition, that we strike the trial court s order which granted their request for an IME examination by a designated orthopaedic surgeon. They assert that this will then allow them flexibility to name a different physician who may have the expertise to address Turner s physical, as well as his neurologic injuries. The order under review permits one IME examination and does not preclude discovery by the Prasads of other medical records relating to Turner s medical condition. If they are unable to obtain the information they require in order to be afforded a fair trial through discovery or through the IME examination, they are without prejudice to file an additional petition in this court, which establishes and demonstrates irreparable harm. Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED. GRIFFIN, J., concurs. ORFINGER, J., concurs in result only. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
