Knadle v Kennedy

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 MICHAEL D. KNADLE, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. ROGER B. KENNEDY, SR., Respondent. ______________________________/ Decision filed July 16, 2004 Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Nancy J. Alley, Judge. Michael C. Sasso and Brian D. Solomon, of Dempsey & Sasso, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner. I William Spivey, II of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, and Elliot H. Scherker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. DENIED. SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion. 5D03-2852 GRIFFIN, J., dissenting. 5D03-2852 In my view, there is more to judicial oversight of discovery than just protecting privileges or trade secrets. Issues of cost, burden, relevance and ulterior motives also require attention, especially when non-parties are involved. To do this accurately usually requires more time than trial judges have to devote to it. This case appears to me to be an unhappy example.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.