Locklear v. UAC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003 JOANNA M. LOCKLEAR, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-14 UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee. / Opinion filed September 19, 2003 Administrative Appeal from the Unemployment Appeals Commission. Joanna M. Locklear, Georgetown, Pro Se. John D. Maher, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Joanna M. Locklear seeks review of an Unemployment Appeals Commission order denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. As is often the case, the record reveals a conflict in the evidence regarding the reason Ms. Locklear s employment with Marcus M. Cornelius, III & Associates, P.A., ended. Our review of the record reveals that the Commission s determination that Ms. Locklear voluntarily left her employment, and is therefore not entitled to benefits is supported by competent, substantial evidence. De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1957). Accordingly, the Commission s order is affirmed. AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.