Matisko v. Matisko

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 ROBERT J. MATISKO, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D02-1238 WANDA E. MATISKO, Appellee. / Opinion Filed January 17, 2003 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Walter Komanski, Judge. Robert J. Matisko, Fern Park, pro se. Paula Pratt and James E. Cheek, III, of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband's failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted. SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.