Canady v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 FREDERICK L. CANADY, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D01-3415 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed June 20, 2003. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, T. Michael Johnson, Judge. James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy-Loewinger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David H. Foxman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. THOMPSON, C.J. Frederick Canady appeals his conviction for attempted felony murder. We affirm. Canady contends that there was insufficient evidence of the underlying felony of attempted robbery, to support his conviction for attempted felony murder. The victim testified that when Canady came into the victim's convenience store, Canady immediately restrained the victim and told his cohort, the gunman, to shoot. The victim testified that after he was shot, he saw people on the street outside and began yelling for help. Canady and the gunman then tried to take him to the beer cooler at the back of the store. The victim initially testified that he did not recall hearing either man ask for money, but later, when asked if either of the men asked in any way for money, the victim replied, "When Canady hold me, ask money, I show him at the cashier. . . . In just in a very quick moment he just say that [sic]." Asked for Canady's exact words, the victim testified, "He asked me where's the money." There was testimony by Byrd, the getaway driver, that the trio had driven around earlier in the day thinking about whether to rob the store, at which, Canady had told the others, they could get some "easy money." Although at trial Byrd and Canady tried to minimize the sense of purpose the trio had, they admitted having discussed the robbery while driving around. Further, Byrd testified that they obtained a gun and a mask, that his assignment was to be the getaway driver, and that the gunman s assignment was to be the lookout. We think this evidence was sufficient proof of the underlying felony of attempted robbery. AFFIRMED. PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
