Esso Standard Oil Co. (PR) v. United States, No. 98-02814 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Slip Op. 07-186 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE __________________________________________ : ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. (PR), : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 98-09-02814 : Defendant. : __________________________________________: OPINION [Partial summary judgment for plaintiff under 19 U.S.C. § 1520] Dated: December 28, 2007 Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP (Curtis W. Knauss, Steven P. Florsheim, Frances P. Hadfield, Robert F. Seely, and Robert B. Silverman) for the plaintiff. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson, Director; Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (Tara K. Hogan); Richard McManus, Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, of counsel, for the defendant. Restani, Chief Judge: Reference is made to the court s recent opinion in Esso Standard Oil Co. (PR) v. United States, Slip Op. 07-171, 2007 WL 4125999 (CIT Nov. 20, 2007). The parties have consulted on the judgment to be entered and determined that pursuant to the court s prior opinion concluding that plaintiff s entries may qualify for relief under 19 U.S.C. § 1520, judgment should enter for plaintiff on the entries covered by protest numbers 4909-97-100057 and 4909-97-100058. That is, plaintiff s first attempt to obtain a refund of overpaid Harbor Maintenance Taxes ( HMT ) as to the entries covered by the 57 protest Court No. 98-09-02814 Page 2 number, which would be premature if it were a true protest, is not premature as a pre-liquidation request for refund of inadvertently collected charges under 19 U.S.C. § 1520(a)(4). The 58 protest entries are subject to reliquidation under former 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c). The dispute now focuses on protest number 4909-97-100059. Because the government s briefing in this matter did not clearly indicate that the entries covered by the 59 protest were the subject of a reliquidation request outside the one-year period allowed by former 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c), the court did not address this issue. Rather, the government claimed that § 1520(c) did not apply at all. Nonetheless, Defendant s Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact, submitted with its opening brief, reflect that plaintiff s original request for reliquidation was dated August 25, 1997, more than one year after the last liquidation covered by the 59 protest. Thus, it was administratively time-barred. Plaintiff does not dispute the accuracy of relevant dates asserted by the defendant. Instead, it argues that the court s prior opinion requires that judgment be granted on the 59 protest. As judgment has not been entered, it is permissible for both parties to clarify their positions. Accordingly, judgment will be entered on the first two protests in favor of plaintiff, because this is proper under 19 U.S.C. § 1520, and judgment will be denied as to the last protest, as this is also the proper course under § 1520. /s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani Chief Judge Dated this 28th day of December, 2007. New York, New York. UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE __________________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : __________________________________________: ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. (PR), Before: Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge Court No. 98-09-02814 JUDGMENT Upon reading the parties moving papers for summary judgment and other papers in this proceeding, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff s motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to protest numbers 4909-97-100057 and 4909-97-100058, ORDERED that refund shall be made of Harbor Maintenance Taxes paid on the entries covered by such protests, ORDERED that any refunds payable by reason of this judgment are to be paid with interest as provided for by law, and ORDERED judgment is awarded to defendant as to protest number 4909-97-100059. /s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani Chief Judge Dated this 28th day of December, 2007. New York, New York.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
