Meter S.p.A. v. United States, No. 95-04 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

 Annotate this Case

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on November 21, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on August 29, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 29, 2002.

Download PDF
Slip Op. 99-45 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS ______________________________ : METER S.p.A., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Court No. 95-04-00371 : THE UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : ______________________________: JUDGMENT On May 11, 1995, the Court ordered the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ("Commerce") to correct certain ministerial errors in Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Italy; Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Reviews and Revocation in Part of an Antidumping Duty Order, 60 Fed. Reg. 10,959 (Feb. 28, 1995). The Court further ordered that Commerce publish amended final results incorporating these corrections in the Federal Register and that the parties file amended complaints to take into account any changes in the final results resulting from Commerce s action. See Meter v. United States, 19 CIT 692, Slip Op. 95-90 (May 11, 1995) (order granting plaintiff s consent motion for leave of Court to correct ministerial errors)(Tsoucalas, Judge). Upon due deliberation, this Court, having found that Commerce published amended final results incorporating the corrections as ordered, see Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof from Italy; Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 60 Fed. Reg. 33,791 (June 29, 1995), and the parties, having failed to file amended complaints within thirty days of the publication of the amended results, and all other issues having been decided, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is dismissed. __________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE Dated: May 21, 1999 New York, New York

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.