Shinyei Corp. v. United States, No. 94-05 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 12, 2001.
Download PDF
Slip Op. 02-73 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS ________________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : ________________________________________: SHINYEI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Court No. 94-05-00271 ORDER Plaintiff Shinyei Corporation of America ("Shinyei") requests this Court to: (a) hold unlawful liquidations by the United States Customs Service ( Customs ) executed with regard to the merchandise at issue in this action; and (b) remand this matter to Customs with instructions to re-liquidate the merchandise at issue in accordance with such instructions as the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration ( Commerce ) may issue. Commerce, in turn: (a) admits that Customs erred in liquidating the consumption entries at issue at the rate at which estimated antidumping duties were required to be deposited upon entry of the merchandise at issue; and (b) requests this Court to remand this case to Commerce for the purpose of issuing instructions to Customs on the basis of Commerce s Final Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Court No. 94-05-00271 Page 2 Bearings) and Parts Thereof From Japan ( Final Results ), 54 Fed. Reg. 19,101 (May 3, 1989) and this Court s decisions with respect to the Final Results, 54 Fed. Reg. 19,101. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is remanded to Commerce to issue instructions to Customs to re-liquidate the merchandise at issue in accordance with Commerce s determination made in the Final Results, 54 Fed. Reg. 19,101, and pertinent decisions of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that the remand results are due within ninety (90) days of the date that this order is entered. Any responses or comments are due within thirty (30) days thereafter. Any rebuttal comments are due within fifteen (15) days after the date the responses or comments are due. NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE DATED: July 25, 2002 New York, New York
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
