Pillsbury Co. v. United States, No. 93-03 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Slip Op. 99-52 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Before: Honorable R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge ______________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : THE UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : ______________________________: THE PILLSBURY COMPANY, Court No. 93-03-00161 JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT defendant United States revocation of (1) the authority of plaintiff The Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) to use the Exporter s Summary Procedure (ESP) in its duty drawback claims, and (2) Pillsbury s blanket waiver of pre-export notification requirements for substitution unused merchandise/same condition drawback claims was contrary to law and void ab initio, and it is further; ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT any same condition drawback claims filed by Pillsbury concerning exports of fresh asparagus shall not be denied by defendant on the ground that Pillsbury did not provide defendant with advance notice of exportation of such goods. ____________________________________ R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, SENIOR JUDGE Dated: June 23, 1999 New York, NY

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.