Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co. v. United States, No. 21-00538 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2023)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE WUXI TIANRAN PHOTOVOLTAIC CO., LTD., Plaintiff, and JA SOLAR TECH. YANGZHOU CO., LTD., SHANGHAI JA SOLAR TECH. CO., LTD., and JINGAO SOLAR CO., LTD., Consolidated Plaintiffs, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge v. Consol. Ct. No. 21-00538 UNITED STATES, Defendant. JUDGMENT Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 38 (Oct. 6, 2022) (“Remand Results”). Plaintiff Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd., submitted comments on the Remand Results arguing that Commerce’s general practice of requiring “complete participation in verification” for all of a respondent’s customers is unreasonable. Comments on Remand Redetermination of Plaintiff, ECF No. 41 at 2–3 (Nov. 7, 2022) (“Tianran Comments”). Nevertheless, in this unique circumstance, Plaintiff concedes that the Remand Results comply with the court’s remand order and does not further challenge Commerce’s determination. Tianran Comments at 2–3 (“Tianran concedes that Commerce’s Remand Results generally complies with the [c]ourt’s Remand Order . . . . Tianran does not further challenge Commerce’s determination in the Remand Results”). Consolidated Plaintiffs do not raise any independent comments. See Objections to Remand Results of Consolidated Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors, ECF. No. 42 (Nov. 7, 2022). Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Remand Results by Commerce are SUSTAINED. /s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani, Judge Dated: January 10, 2023 New York, New York
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
