Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States, No. 16-00116 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on December 5, 2017.
Download PDF
Slip Op. 19-44 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SHENZHEN XINBODA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Plaintiff, JINXIANG HEJIA CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiff-Intervenors, and QINGDAO TIANTAIXING FOODS CO., LTD., ET AL., Consolidated-Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Consol. Court No. 16-00116 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and FRESH GARLIC PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors. JUDGMENT This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of Consol. Court No. 16-00116 Page 2 China, see Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China, 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897 (Dep’t Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED, and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012). /s/ Mark A. Barnett Mark A. Barnett, Judge Dated: April 10, 2019 New York, New York
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
