Shandong Huarong General Corp. v. United States, No. 00-08 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 3, 2000.
Download PDF
Slip-Op. 01-126 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: CHIEF JUDGE GREGORY W. CARMAN SHANDONG HUARONG GENERAL CORP.; LIAONING MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT COMPANY; AND TIANJIN MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Court No.: 00-08-00393 UNITED STATES, Defendant, O. AMES COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenor. FINAL JUDGMENT THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on plaintiffs motion for judgment on the agency record challenging the final and amended final results of the United States Department of Commerce s (Commerce) eighth administrative review of antidumping duty orders covering certain heavy forged hand tools from the People s Republic of China; and the Court in Slip Op. 01-88 having issued an Opinion granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs motion, and remanding the matter to Commerce to reconsider its selection of pallet surrogate value and to recalculate plaintiffs dumping margins accordingly; and Commerce having filed its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Remand Results) with the Court in accordance with Slip Op. 01-88; and the parties having no objection to the Court s sustaining the Remand Results ; and upon all other papers and proceedings had herein; and upon due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Commerce s Remand Results be, and hereby are, sustained; and it is further ORDERED, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed. ____________________________ Gregory W. Carman, Chief Judge Dated: October , 2001 New York, New York ERRATUM Shandong Huarong General Corp.; Liaoning Machinery Import & Export Company; and Tianjin Machinery Import & Export Corp. v. United States and O. Ames Company, Consol. Court No. 00-08-00393, Slip Op. 01-126, Dated October 30, 2001. On Page 1, Court No. 00-08-00393" should read Consol. Court No. 00-08-00393. On Page 2, delete the words deliberation, it is hereby. November 1, 2001
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
