ARUNACHALAM v. KRONOS INCORPORATED , No. 21-1948 (Fed. Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 21-1948 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 06/01/2022 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KRONOS INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1948 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00091-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Kronos Incorporated moves to dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. Lakshmi Arunachalam has not responded to the motion to dismiss. On January 28, 2022, the court reactivated Dr. Arunachalam’s appeal and set February 22, 2022, as the due date for her informal brief. Alternatively, Dr. Case: 21-1948 2 Document: 16 Page: 2 ARUNACHALAM Filed: 06/01/2022 v. KRONOS INCORPORATED Arunachalam was required to file her formal opening brief by April 4, 2022. To date, however, no opening brief has been filed. “[F]ailure to comply with this court’s rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs, appendices and other papers, may result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute.” Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. (3) All pending motions are denied as moot. FOR THE COURT June 1, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court ISSUED AS MANDATE: June 1, 2022
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
