BOSTON SCIENTIFIC v. NEVRO CORP. , No. 21-1775 (Fed. Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORP., Appellant v. NEVRO CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1775 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201901284. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ Z.W. JULIUS CHEN, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PRATIK A. SHAH; MICHAEL P. KAHN, New York, NY; DAVID A. CAINE, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC. RYAN C. MORRIS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III; CHING-LEE FUKUDA, SHARON LEE, New Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022 York, NY; JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 10, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.